🔗 Share this article

Avril Coleridge-Taylor always bore the burden of her parent’s legacy. As the offspring of Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, among the best-known English artists of the 1900s, her reputation was shrouded in the lingering obscurity of the past.

A World Premiere

Not long ago, I reflected on these memories as I got ready to produce the first-ever recording of Avril’s 1936 piano concerto. With its impassioned harmonies, heartfelt tunes, and valiant rhythms, her composition will offer new listeners fascinating insight into how the composer – an artist in conflict born in 1903 – imagined her existence as a artist with mixed heritage.

Past and Present

However about shadows. It requires time to adjust, to recognize outlines as they truly exist, to separate fact from distortion, and I was reluctant to face her history for a period.

I earnestly desired the composer to be a reflection of her father. To some extent, that held. The pastoral English palettes of parental inspiration can be observed in several pieces, including From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). However, one need only examine the headings of her family’s music to understand how he heard himself as not only a flag bearer of English Romanticism but a representative of the African heritage.

It was here that father and daughter began to differ.

The United States evaluated Samuel by the brilliance of his compositions instead of the his racial background.

Samuel’s African Roots

While he was studying at the Royal College of Music, the composer – the offspring of a African father and a British mother – began embracing his African roots. At the time the African American poet the renowned Dunbar came to London in that era, the young musician actively pursued him. He adapted this literary work to music and the next year adapted his verses for a stage piece, Dream Lovers. Subsequently arrived the choral piece that made him famous: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Inspired by this American writer’s The Song of Hiawatha, this composition was an international hit, notably for African Americans who felt indirect honor as American society evaluated the composer by the excellence of his music rather than the his background.

Activism and Politics

Success did not temper Samuel’s politics. At the turn of the century, he participated in the initial Pan African gathering in the UK where he made the acquaintance of the prominent scholar WEB Du Bois and observed a range of talks, covering the oppression of African people in South Africa. He was an activist until the end. He sustained relationships with trailblazers for equality like Du Bois and the educator Washington, delivered his own speeches on equality for all, and even engaged in dialogue on matters of race with the US President while visiting to the US capital in 1904. As for his music, Du Bois recalled, “he wrote his name so prominently as a creative artist that it cannot soon be forgotten.” He died in the early 20th century, at 37 years old. However, how would Samuel have reacted to his child’s choice to work in South Africa in the 1950s?

Issues and Stance

“Child of Celebrated Artist expresses approval to South African policy,” declared a title in the community journal Jet magazine. The system “appeared to me the correct approach”, the composer stated Jet. Upon further questioning, she backtracked: she didn’t agree with apartheid “in principle” and it “ought to be permitted to resolve itself, directed by well-meaning people of diverse ethnicities”. Had Avril been more aligned to her parent’s beliefs, or born in Jim Crow America, she could have hesitated about apartheid. But life had shielded her.

Heritage and Innocence

“I hold a British passport,” she said, “and the officials failed to question me about my race.” So, with her “light” appearance (as Jet put it), she traveled alongside white society, lifted by their praise for her deceased parent. She gave a talk about her family’s work at the educational institution and led the South African Broadcasting Corporation Orchestra in that location, programming the inspiring part of her concerto, subtitled: “In memory of my Father.” Even though a accomplished player personally, she avoided playing as the lead performer in her piece. Rather, she consistently conducted as the maestro; and so the apartheid orchestra followed her lead.

Avril hoped, as she stated, she “could introduce a transformation”. However, by that year, things fell apart. Once officials discovered her mixed background, she was forced to leave the nation. Her British passport failed to safeguard her, the diplomatic official urged her to go or be jailed. She came home, deeply ashamed as the extent of her innocence dawned. “The lesson was a painful one,” she stated. Compounding her disgrace was the 1955 publication of her controversial discussion, a year after her unceremonious exit from that nation.

A Recurring Theme

Upon contemplating with these legacies, I perceived a recurring theme. The narrative of being British until you’re not – which recalls troops of color who fought on behalf of the English in the second world war and survived only to be denied their due compensation. Including those from Windrush,